Cozy Mysteries: When Your Sleuth Figures Things Out

by Elizabeth S. Craig, @elizabethscraig

In every cozy mystery, there comes a time when the sleuth puts together various clues and realizes who the perpetrator is.

But the timing of this revelation can take the story on different paths.

Frequently, there’s a scene near the end of the book when the sleuth confronts or is confronted by the murderer.  It’s the ‘moment of danger’ where it looks a little shaky for the sleuth. After all, this is someone who has already killed once (often twice) and is desperate to escape justice.

So when does the sleuth realize the murderer’s identity: before or during this dangerous encounter?

Before the confrontation

When the sleuth puts two and two together before she confronts the killer, it shows the reader that the gifted amateur is genuinely good at detecting.  She’s dug up clues, analyzed them, and has come up with a solution to the puzzle that makes sense.

But…now this smart person heads out to challenge the murderer?  Considering that the cozy sleuth isn’t a member of the police department, this seems very risky.

Possible ways of preventing the sleuth from doing something stupid: 

The killer confronts the sleuth instead of the other way around (the bad guy/girl realizes that the sleuth is onto them).

The sleuth believes herself to be confronting the killer in a safe way (she’s supposed to have backup with her…and her backup had car trouble, forgot, etc.)

During the confrontation

Maybe sometimes the sleuth has duly registered the clues but hasn’t been able to really put it all together in a way that makes sense.  Or maybe there’s a final clue during a normal conversation with the suspect…perhaps the sleuth realizes that the suspect has just negated their alibi or knows something about the crime that only the killer would know.

This solves the problem of the sleuth looking stupid or reckless for putting herself in danger.  But if it’s not handled well, it can also make the sleuth appear to be slow to figure out the puzzle, especially if the reader has already figured it out (and mystery readers are a savvy bunch).

Possible ways of making sure the sleuth looks good through a last-minute realization:

Have an excellent red herring at the very end. Even better if it’s very subtle and both the sleuth and the reader feel that they’ve learned the killer’s identity.  The sleuth could be investigating this lead when she happens into the encounter with the actual murderer.

Have the solution be on the very tip of the sleuth’s tongue.  Hercule Poirot frequently mentioned in frustration that he knew something important that would identify the murderer,  but he couldn’t place exactly what it was.

Additionally:

The sleuth usually explains how she figured out the murderer’s identity.  This explanation could be provided to the police or given to a sidekick, or could even be explained to the killer himself during the confrontation scene.

What I’ve noticed that readers dislike is if the murderer gives a villainous monologue explaining how they carried out the murders. Better to let the sleuth do as much of the talking as possible.

If you’re a mystery reader, what are your thoughts about the sleuth’s discovery of the killer…have you seen the sleuth come off looking silly?  If you’re a writer, is it a tricky scene to write?

Cozy Mystery Writing: When the Sleuth Realizes the Killer's Identity: Click To Tweet

Photo on VisualHunt

Cozy Mysteries: Red Herrings

by Elizabeth S. Craig, @elizabethscraig

Red herrings, or false leads, can add a lot to a mystery and serve different purposes.

How red herrings add to mysteries: 

They make the mystery more complex. They send the sleuth and reader off in different directions (maybe there was a false confession…someone protecting someone else, for instance).

They add length to the book.  If your mystery is too straightforward, you’re going to end up with a shorter mystery.

They keep the reader from figuring out the killer too early in the story.  Red herrings can be an argument, another body, or something that appears to be an important clue or lead. It can be an alibi that’s disproven. They all help to keep the reader from coming up with the murderer’s identity. Continue reading

Cozy Mystery Writing: Trying New Things

by Elizabeth S. Craig, @elizabethscraig

When I came back from my France trip in July, several people asked me if I was planning to ‘take Myrtle on a trip to Paris.’  Although I think my octogenarian sleuth would likely love Paris and I’m not totally ruling it out, there are problems with taking Myrtle there…or anywhere that isn’t her small town that she usually lives in.

I have taken Myrtle on a little field trip…a cruise a few years ago.   What I discovered, though, was that sometimes readers like the idea of a change.  But when the change is made, sometimes they’re not as enthusiastic.

Here are ideas for shaking things up a little in a long-running cozy mystery series (and some likely pros and cons for doing so):Continue reading

How to Handle the Stakes in a Cozy Mystery + Giveaway (Part 4 of 4)

by H.R. D’Costa, @scribesworld

Wow.

We’ve covered a lot of ground in this four-part blog series on how to handle the stakes in a cozy mystery. (By the way, although the illustrative examples are cozy-centric, many of the tips in this series can be applied to mysteries with a harder edge.)

Today, we’re wrapping things up and putting all the tips from Parts 1–3 of the blog series into action. For this post to make the most sense, you should really read the previous ones (if you haven’t already).

If you need to catch up, check out this list of all the posts in this blog series, with convenient links to Parts 1, 2, and 3:

  1. In Part 1, we covered methods to bolster the stakes that emphasize the sleuth.
  2. In Part 2, we covered methods to bolster the stakes that emphasize other storytelling elements that readers care about.
  3. In Part 3, we discussed considerations to take into account when applying these story stake tips to cozy mysteries in a series.
  4. In Part 4, you’ll see these considerations in action when I share a sample lineup of stakes for a hypothetical cozy-mystery series. (You’re reading Part 4 right now.)

All right. You’re properly oriented. You know that it’s a smart idea to map out the stakes in a cozy-mystery series in advance. That’s because doing so will help you avoid escalation problems in the long run.

When mapping out your stakes, there are three operating principles to keep in mind.

  • Ideally, the novels in your series will be more emotionally intense, as your series goes along.
  • However, the first book in your series should be engaging enough to lure readers into your series.
  • Series loyalty can carry readers through books that might not be as exciting as previous books in a series.

With these principles in hand, you should be able to figure out how to maintain escalation across the books in your cozy-mystery series.

However, before you do this on your own, you might like to see these principles in action.

That’s why I’ve created a sample lineup of stakes to use over the course of a five-book cozy-mystery series. This lineup will give you a sense of the reasoning process you might go through when you map out the stakes in your own series.

Bear in mind, this lineup shouldn’t be treated as a cast-iron mold. It’s there to provide guidance on some considerations that are good to take into account when planning your own cozy-mystery series.

One more thing: unless otherwise indicated, the victim in these plots can be likeable or unlikeable.

In the case of an unlikeable victim, an extra set of stakes (or some other source) supplies the reason for readers to invest in the plot. Using these techniques (as described in Parts 1 and 2 of this blog series) is a must.

In the case of a likeable victim, it’s optional. You don’t need to compensate for the victim’s unlikeability—but, by applying the same techniques, you’ll enhance your readers’ experience.

Okay, here’s the sample lineup:Continue reading

How to Handle the Stakes in a Cozy Mystery + Giveaway (Part 3 of 4)

by H.R. D’Costa, @scribesworld

Standalone or series.

It’s a dilemma that many novelists face.

But for authors of cozy mysteries, the decision’s almost a foregone conclusion: series.

By all accounts, that’s what fans of the subgenre enjoy (especially the tropes they encounter again and again). That’s what fans expect.

Plus, as our blog host Elizabeth Spann Craig explains, writing a book for a series is oftentimes easier than writing a standalone because:

Usually everything after book one has already been established…You’ve already developed the main characters and the huge amount of work that goes along with that is mainly finished. The groundwork has been laid and you can focus on other aspects of your story.

In short, writing in a series is a win for you as well as for your readers. However, it does come with a complication that standalone novels don’t.

Before I get into specifics, let me just share a quick reminder. This post is part of an ongoing blog series about how to handle the stakes in a cozy mystery. (By the way, although the illustrative examples are cozy-centric, many of the tips in this series can be applied to mysteries with a harder edge.)

Parts 1 and 2 set the context for this post, so I strongly recommend that you read them first (if you haven’t already) before continuing.

Below, you’ll find an overview of the topics in this blog series, with convenient links to Parts 1 and 2:

  • In Part 1, we covered methods to bolster the stakes that emphasize the sleuth.
  • In Part 2, we covered methods to bolster the stakes that emphasize other storytelling elements that readers care about.
  • In Part 3, we’ll discuss considerations to take into account when applying these story stake tips to cozy mysteries in a series. (You’re reading Part 3 right now.)
  • In Part 4 (forthcoming), you’ll see these considerations in action when I share a sample lineup of stakes for a hypothetical cozy-mystery series.

Okay, with that overview in place, let’s return to that complication I mentioned earlier—the one you’ll have to face if you’re writing a cozy-mystery series (as opposed to a standalone).

The Special Problem You Face When Writing a Series

With any novel, you need to keep tabs on escalation.

Your plot should become progressively more interesting as it goes along.

If it doesn’t—if say, for example, all your genre elements are front-loaded into the first half of your story—everything that follows will feel anticlimactic in comparison, ultimately creating a dissatisfying reader experience.

But with a series, you have an additional burden.

You have to worry not only about the escalation within each individual book in the series, but also about how the series escalates as a whole. That is to say, based on how you developed the plots of your books, readers may feel like your series went downhill after a certain point.

A Common Mistake Made with the First Book in a Cozy-Mystery Series

Now that you’re aware of the issue with escalation, let’s bring it back to the topic of this blog-post series—handling the stakes in a mystery when the victim is unlikeable—and put all the pieces together.

An unlikeable victim can be advantageous because this situation generates plenty of suspects, which’ll keep your plot lively.

At the same time, it comes with a major drawback: readers might not care about solving the case. Why should they invest in catching the killer of an unlikeable person?

As one solution, instead of building the stakes around achieving justice for the sake of the victim, you build them around saving the sleuth protagonist from terrible consequences—e.g. being charged with the murder herself.

Due to the high stakes, readers will become emotionally invested in the plot.

Indeed, because of the appeal of these stakes, many novelists gravitate toward using this setup (the protagonist is the prime suspect) for the first book in their series.

However, although this can be an excellent way to convince readers to give your cozy-mystery series a chance, you can run into a problem down the line.

You started your series with the protagonist in an emotionally intense situation…which means you haven’t really given yourself room to escalate.

Although subsequent books ARE interesting in their own right, compared to the first book, they might not feel AS interesting.

In sum, readers could feel like your series went downhill after book #1, and abandon your series midway through it. Fortunately, it’s easy to avoid this outcome. Take a look…

3 Operating Principles to Maintain the Appeal of Your Cozy-Mystery Series

How to maintain the appeal of your series in the long run?

Simple. Just map out the plot for each book in the series in advance, and assess each one’s impact on how the series escalates as a whole.

By mapping out, we’re talking broad strokes here, so this is something both “plotters” and “pantsers” can do. Although, it must be said, the more details you know ahead of time, the more you can take advantage of that knowledge in later books.

When you do this, keep the following three operating principles in mind.

  1. Ideally, the novels in your series will be more emotionally intense, as your series goes along.
  2. However, the first book in your series should be engaging enough to lure readers into your series.
  3. Series loyalty can carry readers through books that might not be as exciting as previous books in a series.

* * *

By adhering to the three principles listed above, you should be able to figure out how to preserve escalation across all the books in your cozy-mystery series.

But, before you do this on your own, you might like to see these principles in action, and get a sense of the reasoning process you’ll be going through. Happily, that’s the topic of the next (and last) post in this four-part blog series. See you then!

In the meantime, if you’d like to dig deeper into story stakes, download this cheat sheet with 11 types of story stakes. It might (a) give you additional ideas for how to make readers emotionally invested in the outcome of the case as well as (b) help you generate a variety of motives to match your healthy list of suspects.

You can also check out my writing guide Story Stakes: Your #1 Writing Skills Strategy to Produce a Page-Turner That Transforms Readers into Raving Fans of Your Screenplay or Novel . See below for details on how you could win a paperback copy…

Win a Paperback Copy of Story Stakes

For every post in this blog series, you have a chance to win a paperback copy of Story Stakes  ($15.95).

Described as “a must-have in your top 10 books on writing” by one Amazon reviewer, it’ll show you how to use story stakes to elicit the maximum degree of emotion from readers as well as how to raise the stakes (even when they’re already high!).

For a chance to win today, answer this question in the comments: Besides escalation, what are other challenges that you face when writing a series?

Elizabeth will randomly select four lucky winners by Monday, August 19.

Note: This giveaway is only open to residents of North America, South America, and Europe.

Good luck and happy writing!

About H. R. D’Costa

A graduate of Brown University, H. R. D’Costa (a.k.a. HRD) is an author and writing coach who specializes in story structure and story stakes.

Known for her “deep dive” instruction style, she is the author of 8 writing guides including Sizzling Story Outlines , Story Stakes, and the 4-volume Story Structure Essentials series .

For practical, actionable writing tips designed to help you keep readers glued to your pages, visit her website scribemeetsworld.com, which is also home to the Ultimate Story Structure Worksheet (downloaded over 37,000 times by writers from around the world).

One Common Mistake Mystery Writers Make When Handling Unlikeable Victims (by @scribesworld ): Click To Tweet

IMAGE CREDITS: Coffee & book by Amariei Mihai; Misty lake by Dominik Dombrowski; Detective in a trench by Shawn Liew

Scroll to top