Beyond Amazon–Tracking Your Novel’s Sales—by Amy Dawson Robertson

miles to go I’d like to welcome guest blogger Amy Dawson Robertson to Mystery Writing is Murder today. Amy is a native Virginian and graduated from St. John’s College in Annapolis. She lives in the Washington DC area and her writing interests include genre fiction, short stories and graphic novels. She creates strong female characters in action-packed stories drawn on current events. Miles to Go is Amy’s first novel.

In the old days, before the internet was a twinkle in eye of Leonard Kleinrock, writers were condemned to worry and wonder. Say you published a book. And it’s 1888. Or 1942. Or even 1994. Congratulations! You have a contract with your publisher for, maybe, a 15% royalty rate on hardcover sales. Your book is slated for release just before Christmas. Perfect. The book comes out, you get a few reviews – some good, some so-so. Sometimes you go visit your book at the bookstore around the corner and you wonder how it’s selling. You know you won’t have an inkling (unless you’re one of the very lucky few to hit the NYT bestseller list) until you get your first royalty statement.

In. The. Mail.

The mail that will be known in the as yet unknowable future as snail mail.

Writers, tending to be a thoughtful bunch, can’t help but fixate on the notion that this thing that they are driven to do might have value. And not just some esoteric notion of value but quantifiable value. Dollars and cents value. And ultimately, that accumulation of dollars and cents is indicative of individual minds that each made the decision to buy your book.

That’s right. Buy. Your. Book.

Which means there’s a good possibility that same said mind might read your book.

Read. Your. Book.

And that’s really what the writer cares about. We want people to read our books. Everyone single one of us remembers “coming out” as a writer to our friends and their raised eyebrows. It’s hubristic after all. It means you think you have something so worth saying that it not only deserves to be printed on a page and bound between two covers, but also to be cataloged and entered into libraries. Which means of course that it might live for eternity. And it means you believe that it is a reasonable proposition for people, real people, to spend the hard-earned fruits of their labor on your book. If anything’s hubristic that is, right? It’s still hard to know who is buying your book but it is getting easier to know if anyone actually is.

The internet, thankfully, is all about minutia, quantification and immediate satisfaction and nowadays our friendly author is now a member of a coterie of

“twitchy neurotic messes who obsess about their sales, a fact which Amazon should be well aware of because we check our Amazon numbers four hundred times a day, and a one-star Amazon review causes us to crush up six Zoloft and snort them into our nasal cavities, because waiting for the pills to digest would just take too long.”

Maybe this sounds familiar, right? Unless you have endless time to stalk your book in all of the places it sells, you really don’t have a notion if anyone is buying it. So whether you’re in it for the money or that special satisfaction of envisioning your words coursing through another human being’s brain, now there are a few tracking tools that can help you take the edge off until your royalty statement turns up.

Each of these tools captures Amazon sales rank information (admittedly only one piece of the pie). There are other paid tracking sources such as Publisher Alley that pulls their data from Baker & Taylor and the mythic BookScan that grabs data from bookstores everywhere. But if you’re looking for free, here’s a peek at the four that I have found since my book was published.

First there was Titlez . Titlez was my first Amazon sales tracker. I was still naive then.

Titlez, which is still in beta, allows you to track as many books as you’d like. Then it arranges the books you’re tracking into an actively ranked list. If you expand a title, you can see how it has performed over time. Each dot represents the sales rank for a single instance in a day. Sales rank is captured once a day. Note that when the line goes flat that means you are having a sale or more likely multiples sales every day or mostly every day. By hovering over each dot you can see what the sales ranks was for that day and what time it was captured. It’s important to note that Amazon rankings fluctuate wildly (I won’t even get into the mathematical speculation that surrounds it) so it’s best to look at your rank over time. Titlez is especially useful to see how your book is doing in comparison to similar books in its genre.

clip_image002[4]

Next, Metric Junkie swept in on a big noisy motorcycle and stole my attention. Catching my fickle eye with sexy pie charts, bar graphs, and best of all, a thing of their own invention: Cha-chingers™. Yes, Cha. Chingers. (™) And we know what that means.

While the biggest limitation to Titlez is that it only captures data once a day, Metric Junkie solves that problem by capturing data hourly. The image below shows an eight hour time span when five books were purchased.

clip_image001

Metric Junkie only allows you to track ten titles (per account) but you can see the sales of those titles across any time period you choose. The pie chart also shows how the ten titles rate against each other by percentage. The bar chart allows you to see how you’re doing week to week, month to month, etc., graphically.

clip_image005

After my experiences with Titlez and Metric Junkie, I’d been through a lot and I was more mature. So when a subtle, handsome application called NovelRank came along I was ready to jump on board. Most appealingly, it could capture multiple sales in a hour. Did you hear me? Multiple sales in an hour. Yeah, seriously, I was blown away.

Though NovelRank doesn’t have as many graphical ways to display your data, it has an RSS feed feature that will show you those multiple sales in an hour. For instance, from the time period of 11AM-7PM where Metric Junkie shows five sales, NovelRank shows seven including three in one hour. This is what showed up in my RSS reader:

clip_image006

NovelRank is cosmopolitan too. It captures international Amazon sales data — this is how it displays:

clip_image008
clip_image009

NovelRank can also download your hourly sales rank into an Excel file making it easier to pinpoint fluctuations in your sales. (You may find you need pocket protection if you go this far.)

Another application that only recently caught my eye is Rankforest. Rankforest allows you one title to track for free — I don’t see much value to this service except that it is the only sales tracking application I’ve found that also tracks Barnes and Noble. It is mostly useful as an application on the side.

How accurate are any of these tools? It’s hard to say. I haven’t seen my first royalty statement yet and I don’t know how analyzed it will be. I have found that these tools take the edge off the wait a bit. But I also believe that such applications can offer a snapshot of how your book is doing which can influence how you strategize your own marketing. Mondays tend to be very good sales days for book buying so maybe you’ll want to post to your blog or otherwise remind people of your existence sometime Monday morning. Businesses are investing more and more in data mining and accessing valuable results. Likewise, the more data a writer has, the more she can understand her audience and the market. Unfortunately, none of these tools will write your next book for you, so quit fooling around on the internet and get to work!

Amy Dawson Robertson

Author of Miles To Go: A Rennie Vogel Intrigue

http://amydawsonrobertson.com/

Being Creative on the Computer

blog10 I’m doing my best to eliminate paper from my writing process.

At this point, the only paper that’s still around are the notebooks (and Post It notes) for my car and purse. I need those for writing on the go (because I grab every second I can.)

But at the end of the day, the paper I wrote on is transcribed onto the computer and thrown away.

Why am I doing this? Well, I’ve discovered that as much as I love paper, it’s slowing me down. And I don’t have much time to spare.

I used to do a lot of writing on paper. But then I discovered that A. I frequently lost the paper and B. I had to transcribe everything onto the computer—I was effectively writing the material twice.

My revising? It was all done on paper. I’d print it out (and this would be 270 pages, single sided) and then go through and mark it up like crazy.

Then I’d have to go back and page-by-page make all the corrections…looking back and forth from the printed, marked up text to the computer, finding the right place…

It was just too slow.

Now, if you’re not in any hurry or under any deadlines, then do what works best for you! But if you do want to go paper free, then here are my tips–

How I weaned myself off paper:

Never let myself get too far ahead on paper…maybe 2 pages…before I made myself transcribe it. This kept me from having 20 or 30 pages that needed to be put into Word. And, after a while, I thought how much quicker the process would be if I just wrote on the computer.

Remembered my deadlines—self-imposed and publisher-imposed. That tends to spur me into action.

Learned how to do revisions on the computer with Track Changes (all editors want to work with Track Changes now). Since the editors were using Track Changes, I got more practice doing revisions on my computer.

Practiced brainstorming on the computer (trying to generate new ideas while looking at a blank screen. It wasn’t easy….)

I remembered how much it cost me to print out all those pages I used for revisions…in paper and printer ink.

But, what’s the biggest thing to remember if you do all your writing on the computer?

BACK IT UP!!!!!! Use a thumb drive, USB, external hard drive, or email it to yourself. Just make sure it’s somewhere. Because it won’t be on paper anymore for you to piece together. Now I’m more careful than I used to be (although I still screw up and end up accidentally losing text.)

I’m thinking there’s an age gap with the writing on paper thing. It’s VERY easy for my kids to be creative on the computer, but I had to really work at it. I’m thinking that the younger you are, the easier it might be to make the change (if you haven’t already.)

Which is easier for you—paper or word processing?

In other news–I’ve murdered my comment widget. :) It comes easily to a mystery writer. Too many problems for many of my Blogger friends and when I discovered that several people had tried to comment and couldn’t, it had to go. I’m still looking for the perfect universal commenting system that’s compatible with Blogger…when I find it, I’ll let you know!

The Long and the Short of It

blog40
When it comes to writing, we all tackle things different ways.  We outline or don’t outline.  We focus mainly on plot or mainly on character.  We revise as we go or wait till we’re done.  We watch our word count closely or worry about it later.

Our process is different, but we all end up with the same result—a finished manuscript.  But how long did we spend on each part of it?  What took us the longest during the process?

So I’m curious—out of the list below, what takes you the longest? Or is there something else that takes longer?  What’s the easiest for you?

Coming up with the original idea
Brainstorming the original idea
Researching
Outlining (if you do it)
Organizing the story
Creating individual characters
Character development
The beginning of the book
The ending of the book
Developing the conflicts…internal and external
Revising the first draft
Revising subsequent drafts

For me, character development takes the longest. I think that’s because I change so much of it through the revision process—a character will start out one way, and end up being completely different by the end of the book.  So I have to go back and do quality control.  :)  Also, I have a pretty difficult time with book endings.

The easiest thing for me is coming up with the original idea, followed closely by organizing the book (mine tend to follow a particular format.)

Your turn!

******************************************************

I’m running this same survey today over at Inkspot (the blog for Midnight Ink writers), if you’re interested in seeing their take on it. Also, if y’all could continue giving me feedback on this commenting widget. Is it remembering you? Is it hard on Blogger folks? Is it a royal pain or not too bad?  I like the threaded comments, but I don’t want any hassle. :)

Getting Our Point Across

Henri Matisse - Mlle Matisse In A Scottish Plaid Coat, 1918, Mr. & Mrs. Albert Taubman Collection, Switzerland.My mother is, right now, my only first reader.  I think only a mom will put up with being asked to drop everything and read a book from start to finish because the writer is right up on top of a deadline.

Mama just finished reading my second Memphis book which I emailed to my agent Friday afternoon. Her technique is to print the manuscript out, read it, and put sticky flags on pages where she has questions or corrections.  Then she calls me on the phone and goes through the corrections page by page.
She called me twice this time—once for the corrections for the first half of the book and once for the second half’s corrections.

During both phone calls she had at least one time where she said, “I didn’t understand what you were trying to say here. Were you trying to say…?” then she’d trail off.

Both times I read the paragraph.  And read it again.  “I meant…Well, I meant…” I’d pause and read it again.  “Okay, I don’t know what I meant.”

I ended up ditching both paragraphs and rewriting them.  Because, if I can’t even explain them, that’s not a good sign.


Usually these paragraphs are really awkward. Frequently this is because:

*It’s got a passive voice construction and is a big was/had past participle mess. 
*It’s hard to tell who is talking.
*It’s hard to tell to whom they’re talking.
*The sentences are too long.

Usually I just chuck the whole thing and start over. But if there were a lot of paragraphs, that would get old, fast.  Other ways to address it are to:

*Make it active.
*Include dialogue tags (keeping it simple…said or asked is fine)
*Divide long sentences into shorter ones.
*Consider a different way to deliver the info in the paragraph—like including it in dialogue, instead.

Catching these awkward constructions?  If you’re doing the revision process solo, reading aloud would be the best solution (clearly I didn’t take my own advice and do that!)  Otherwise…it is something that a first reader would probably catch.

Thanks, Mama!

Twitterific

Terry3 I’ve had a few people ask me to run more writing links here—and for some reason I keep forgetting!  I post probably 25 or more writing links a day on Twitter, but that doesn’t help if you’re not a member.
So, here are some links from the last few days.  :)  Good thing I’m a skimmer!
The one-line book pitch: http://bit.ly/cmGvos 5:45 AM Mar 24th via web
Give your characters cabin fever and change your setting: http://bit.ly/9MS163
How novelists are entrepreneurs: http://bit.ly/d61aPc 5:44 AM Mar 24th via web
Gaining authenticity in our writing: http://bit.ly/awTa0e 5:43 AM Mar 24th via web
7 things one YA writer has learned so far: http://bit.ly/c9yq6o 5:07 PM Mar 23rd via web
Memorizing poetry: http://bit.ly/apxE3X 5:07 PM Mar 23rd via web
Overusing protagonist names: http://bit.ly/a7GZQg 5:06 PM Mar 23rd via web
An agent on spammy query letter subject lines: http://bit.ly/cVPjzV @NathanBransford
Why YA romance needs to change: http://bit.ly/bxzFY3 @inwhichagirl 5:02 PM Mar 23rd via
The 5 protagonists you meet in YA: http://www.yahighway.com/ @yaHighway
A few thoughts on 1st person: http://bit.ly/9KJTHv 1:29 PM Mar 23rd via web
Required–the crappy first draft: http://bit.ly/bjlu2c @merylkevans 1:28 PM Mar 23rd via web
Cleaning up our manuscripts: http://bit.ly/cBKkD2 @katmagendie 1:25 PM Mar 23rd via web
Using irony in your novel: http://bit.ly/dD8lLA 1:23 PM Mar 23rd via web
A tool to help you track your queries: http://bit.ly/cix926 1:22 PM Mar 23rd via web
One writer’s thoughts on fitting in backstory: http://bit.ly/9e0Omv 9:47 AM Mar 23rd via web
SF cover art: http://bit.ly/bwY9uE 9:44 AM Mar 23rd via web
Being fearless with our writing: http://bit.ly/97KVh7 9:43 AM Mar 23rd via web
Does your novel pass the p. 69 test? http://bit.ly/9RFB1O 9:42 AM Mar 23rd via web
How to find your agent (researching): http://bit.ly/bPZK8u 9:41 AM Mar 23rd via web
Writing characters from the inside out: http://bit.ly/bKVl3x 9:39 AM Mar 23rd via web
Mixing past and present tense: http://bit.ly/biRlX6 9:38 AM Mar 23rd via web
World-building–the foundation: http://bit.ly/aEZfzt 6:01 AM Mar 23rd via web
Writer as career vs writer as identity: http://bit.ly/a9S5Jz @JustineLavaworm 5:54 AM Mar 23rd
Learning from a first rejection letter: http://bit.ly/a7pvre @suvudu 5:53 AM Mar 23rd via web
Writing a make-out scene: http://bit.ly/aR2aYy 5:50 AM Mar 23rd via web
What makes a novel crumble? http://bit.ly/aNY3NL 5:50 AM Mar 23rd via web
Fiction without borders–blurring the line between genres: http://bit.ly/9YXS4N
Un-American thrillers–why are Scandinavians dominating the field? http://bit.ly/dbWIWZ
2009 bestsellers lost ground to the long tail of online retailing (PW) http://bit.ly/c8VKEW
Cappuccinos in your local library? It’s all just froth (Telegraph, UK) : http://bit.ly/8ZDDp2
Picture books as vitamins for infants born into a digital age: http://bit.ly/cabhMS
Forming your critique group (getting members, location, format): http://bit.ly/aLW80W
Each character has a story: http://bit.ly/9h67I1 @bookviewcafe 5:36 AM Mar 23rd via web
Ted Hughes joins lit greats at Poets’ Corner, Westminster Abbey (Guardian, UK) : http://bit.ly/c4cJSX 5:35 AM Mar 23rd via web
Borders stores want you and your book club: http://bit.ly/b8ixrl @hopeclark 5:34 AM Mar 23rd
The importance of putting your contact info on your blog, etc: http://bit.ly/cJmxjV
The Gr8 deb8: http://bit.ly/bGbHTA 5:32 AM Mar 23rd via web
Zombies are not the new vampires: http://bit.ly/9aBYqY @johnottinger 1:23 PM Mar 22nd via
“Oh, it’s only an e-book…” : http://bit.ly/b4fO30 1:22 PM Mar 22nd via web
for a great story: http://bit.ly/bm5JDS @dlschubert 1:22 PM Mar 22nd via web
Pride and sensibility–Austen’s literary ambitions (NPR) : http://bit.ly/bL3kmF
Effective dialogue in novels: http://bit.ly/cvhftu 1:20 PM Mar 22nd via web
Agent research: http://bit.ly/bM2Wxv 1:20 PM Mar 22nd via web
Tech news for nerds–living in the future with smart phones and e-readers: http://bit.ly/c4tam3
The mirror technique for describing characters: http://bit.ly/9biIbL 1:18 PM Mar 22nd via web
Is true translation of poetry impossible? http://bit.ly/b7XPAh 1:18 PM Mar 22nd via web
How to play nice at writers’ conferences: http://bit.ly/cL6Rba 1:17 PM Mar 22nd via web
One writer’s method for creating an outline: http://bit.ly/c9TMcM 1:16 PM Mar 22nd via web
10 quick tips for concise and compelling writing: http://bit.ly/brWsgj 1:15 PM Mar 22nd via web
Squinting modifiers: http://bit.ly/akBeEN 1:15 PM Mar 22nd via web
Another take on getting more blog comments (not recommended!): http://bit.ly/b1wbeq
Bio on poet Ted Hughes who had relationships w/ 2 women who killed themselves (Sylvia Plath and Wevill) Guardian, UK : http://bit.ly/aefZJs 10:12 AM Mar 22nd via web
A blog tip to get you more comments: http://bit.ly/dh3Jnw @alexisgrant 9:57 AM Mar 22nd via The class structure of British lit–who’s at the bottom? At the top?: http://bit.ly/cGPUVL
Back to the basics of novel pitching: http://bit.ly/dzLKsl 9:54 AM Mar 22nd via web
Don’t let readers hang up on your story: http://bit.ly/atyrKU 9:53 AM Mar 22nd via web
The vorpal copy editor: http://bit.ly/csELuX 9:53 AM Mar 22nd via web
The power in a character name: http://bit.ly/9ey6Pg 9:52 AM Mar 22nd via web
Prioritizing blogging and blog visiting: http://bit.ly/dcLucV 9:52 AM Mar 22nd via web
Why Austen would never win a Booker (Independent, UK) : http://bit.ly/cReBz7
5 tips for becoming an early riser (and maybe getting some writing done?) : http://bit.ly/9WcLjb
5 things to avoid in query letters: http://bit.ly/9JW22s 7:34 AM Mar 22nd via web
Free online marketing help for the technophobic author: http://bit.ly/bqcJgd 7:34 AM Mar 22nd
Reading writing tips–is a little knowledge a dangerous thing? http://is.gd/aSuqV
Story design–the right narrator for your book: http://short.to/1q7xs 5:45 AM Mar 22nd via web
Getting real–does your voice have credibility? http://short.to/1qa9t 5:44 AM Mar 22nd via web
An agent says that perseverance is key: http://short.to/1qh54 5:44 AM Mar 22nd via
The bargain book business by the numbers: http://bit.ly/bVYNzc 5:22 AM Mar 22nd
Don’t settle for being published badly: http://bit.ly/9aoWNK 5:22 AM Mar 22nd
Best tweets for writers (wk ending 3-19)–Writer’s Digest: http://bit.ly/bd4JW0 How one YA writer landed 2 multi-book deals: http://bit.ly/a469IW 5:39 PM Mar 21st
No time to read? One man’s experiment to break free from TV: http://bit.ly/aIvSYi
Cover letters and why you need an elevator pitch: http://bit.ly/aA3TSc 5:38 PM Mar 21st
Demystifying lit agents: http://bit.ly/bUD3sY 11:16 AM Mar 21st
Anatomy of a multi-author blog: http://bit.ly/a6bAbN 11:16 AM Mar 21st
Something to dream about: upcoming lit festivals and workshops in Paris: http://bit.ly/dBpqCG What the Dickens–why genius is only human: http://bit.ly/anrzPR 11:14 AM Mar 21st
Characters and Margaret Mitchell: http://bit.ly/a57BgL 11:14 AM Mar 21st
Reviews on banned books–via @micheleemrath: http://bit.ly/akexlU 8:42 AM Mar 21st
Texts without context (NY Times): http://nyti.ms/dwYflp 8:10 AM Mar 21st
Revisiting ‘7 Habits of Highly Effective People’: http://bit.ly/9n97qu 8:08 AM Mar 21st
Chris Brogan on not being able to keep up (social media): http://bit.ly/dysRvs 8:06 AM Mar 21st
Kids’ reading and the question of age-appropriate: http://bit.ly/b3pguD 8:05 AM Mar 21st
An agent gives tips for growing as a writer: http://bit.ly/aBXbmg 8:01 AM Mar 21st
5 big ways to add time to your days: http://bit.ly/aIxqn2 5:51 PM Mar 20th
Querying blunders (more agents share): http://bit.ly/aOgPGc @OPWFT 9:26 AM Mar 20th
How 8 Writers Do It: Deepening Your Characters http://bit.ly/dnfN8G

Famous writers and their day jobs: http://bit.ly/dxKbet 8:35 AM Mar 20th 

On another note, I’m trying to see if I like this new commmenting thingy.  As y’all know, I don’t ever change my blog at all.  :)   Please let me know if the commenting thing is obnoxious or not.  I thought threaded comments might be interesting to do, but I don’t know if this is the widget for me or not. 

Scroll to top